Another interview, this time with Business Week
Here is another email interview I did about Steve Jobs. Business Week Indonesia had emailed me on Wednesday morning with four questions. This should appear in the next edition of the magazine, which is next week, if not the week after.
As with the Media Indonesia profile, I'm pretty sure this will be heavily cut down especially since this is for a story on the reactions by Indonesians on Jobs' passing. I have no idea how many people were asked for their opinions, so if they decide to include even half of my answers, I'll be very surprised.
1. What crossed your mind when you heard about Steve Jobs' death?
Obviously, I was shocked that his time had come so soon. I knew that his health was deteriorating but didn't expect that he would be gone so suddenly.
2. What do you think about Steve Jobs?
Steve Jobs was a visionary. He was leader who knew what he wanted and how to achieve it. He knew the kinds of people that he needed to realize his vision and knew how to get them. He didn't get what he wanted some of the time and sometimes what he wanted was too advanced for the technology so he went and made sure the technology caught up with his vision. In other words, he brought forward technologies that many people were still dreaming about or would see only in movies.
From the stories told by people who worked with Jobs, he was a very straightforward person. He didn't mince words, he didn't like pleasantries, he was always focused on what he wanted to achieve and hated distractions. Executives or public figures would often entertain the notion of awards being given to them, but not Jobs. He never cared about awards. To him, awards that were meant for him should be given to the company instead because any achievement would not have been possible without team work.
Despite being a public figure, Jobs was very private. His shares in Disney and Apple were valued at more than $7 billion but his house is very modest, there was nothing fancy about the way he lived except that he drove an SL-class Mercedes without a license plate.
You can learn a lot about Steve Jobs and his views from his 2005 Stanford commencement address.
3. How is the future of Apple's products, especially the innovations after Steve Jobs is gone?
Apple has always prepared products for two to three years ahead of the current generation, which means right now, Apple has a product roadmap all set until at least 2014 although it doesn't mean that the products are final. By no means they are final.
In the last several years Apple had been building up a lot of technologies to create the future of consumer electronics. They are moving from platter storage drives to flash-based storage drives. They are shifting from optical drives to direct downloads, non-physical mode of data delivery.
These moves are foundations of future devices and systems that we may not even imagine yet, but Apple is already building them.
I wouldn't worry about innovation at Apple. Ideas can come from anyone within the company especially since Apple doesn't operate like any other company in the world.
Apple can also purchase companies and hire people who have great ideas like what they did with Siri. They bought the company that made Siri in April 2010 for somewhere between $100 million – $200 million.
Siri is the latest component that will shape Apple's future as a consumer technology company. Right now it's still in beta and it will remain in beta until Apple gets it right. When Siri becomes a far more mature product in about two, maybe three years, you'll probably feel like you're living in Star Trek's world. Even right now with the iPad, iPhone, and iPod touch, it's already looking like that but 300 years earlier.
4. What makes you enjoy using Apple's products, what is so special about them compared to other brands?
Apple's products are not like any other because they don't follow the rules. If something is not possible because the technology isn't there, Apple builds the technology for it, like the Thunderbolt connector for example, which it designed with Intel.
Apple pays extreme attention to detail and it shows in their products. Everything about an Apple product is thought of down to the very last detail.
User experience at Apple is the most important aspect and not a lot of other companies understand this concept thoroughly. Not Google, not Microsoft, not HP, not Acer. Nokia once had this understood but it lost its way almost a decade ago but is slowly rediscovering it.
User experience isn't just about using the product, it's covers the period from before you bought it, while buying it, after you bought it, when you use it, and even after you replace it. Apple has all this covered.
Apple doesn't think about what will sell first, it's concerned with what technology should be available to help make people's lives better, and then, considers whether it will sell. For people who find that hard to believe, look at what the iOS devices have done. It allows doctors to monitor patients more closely, it lets people produce creative works of art from music to motion picture to paintings and more.
At the same time, there's nothing great about the hardware specification of the iPad. Many other tablets are more advanced technologically but they aren't selling at all. What makes the iPad a great product is the combination of hardware and software that Apple had put together to create a device that allows people to do what they need or want to do. Apple's products are enablers.
I find it sad that a lot of people buy Apple's products because they think the devices are cool and trendy and they have no idea how to use them properly. They may be cool and trendy now but I buy Apple's products because they let me do what I want to do in a fun, practical, and easy way.
I've bought Apple's products since 1999 and the company hasn't changed its fundamentals since then. It has always been at the forefront of the consumer technology innovation.

